Procedura Maher Arar functzioneaza atat timp cat Antonov 24v YR-FEL este inca in zona…

Probabil in 1999 s-a activat acea procedura de ??parasutisti?? militari inspirata din Jean Larteguy – Les Centurions – prin care functioneaza in zona o ?politzie? economica de tip politzie militara – asta este pur teoria conspiratziei… Curios, matusa-mea Constantza (Tantza) Arteanu, nascuta Tutzescu in zona actualului cinematograf Patria din Craiova – casa demolata – a fost pagubita la Cluj in scandalul Caritas, succedat se pare de emisia (IPO – Initial Public Offering) de actziuni la Banca Transilvania. Matusha-mea Tantza, mama Dacianei si ?? a murit acum 2 ani, se pare.. dupa o fractura de col femural si alte complicatzii. Parerea mea umila este ca daca acel Antonov AN 24v de la Electrotehnica Craiova (mai exista si un Antonov AN 2 intr-un sens giratoriu prin Petroshani) ar fi trimis inapoi la Romatsa SA sau Romaero SA Baneasa, multe din “problemele” de asha-zisa “sigurantza natzionala” ar disparea de la sine. AN 24 YR-FEL a fost adus in Craiova se pare urmare a unei hotarari de guvern prin toamna 1999. Daca-mi aduc eu minte aminte bine ceea ce am citit pe INTERNET, parca artista Madalina Manole era chiar angajata la ROMATSA SA, sper sa nu ma inshel… Probabil asha sunt asimilatzi bursierii/absolventzii de studii academice internatzionale, drept niste piese de inventar de expus, gen Antonov AN24 sau AN2… Trista, tzara, Romania, din pacate!

 14 SEP 1999 Type: Dassault Falcon 900B
Operating for: Olympic Airways
Leased from: Elleniki Polemikí Aeroporía
Registration: SX-ECH
C/n / msn: 026
First flight: 1987
Total airframe hrs: 6427
Cycles: 3405
Engines: 3 Garrett TFE731-5BR-1C
Crew: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 3
Passengers: Fatalities: 7 / Occupants: 10
Total: Fatalities: 7 / Occupants: 13
Airplane damage: Substantial
Airplane fate: Repaired
Location: FIR Bucharest (Romania)
Phase: En route (ENR)
Nature: Executive
Departure airport: Athens-Ellinikon International Airport (ATH/LGAT), Greece
Destination airport: Bucharest-Otopeni International Airport (OTP/LROP), Romania
Flightnumber: 3838
Narrative:
Falcon 900B SX-ECH was owned by the Greek Air Force and operated by Olympic Airways. A Greek government delegation, a.o. minister in charge of European affairs, Yiannos Kranidiotis, were to visit Bucharest. Their plane departed Athens 18:16 UTC. During climb, after the flaps and slats were retracted, the flight crew noticed, on the warning panel, the “PITCH FEEL” light, was illuminated. The captain disengaged the autopilot, checked the forces on the control column and re-engaged the autopilot. The “PITCH FEEL” warning light, remained continuously ON, during cruise and descent until the slats were extended. The Falcon reached a cruising altitude of FL400 until 47 minutes from take-off, when a normal descent to FL150 was initiated, with the autopilot
engaged in vertical speed (V/S) mode. During descent the Indicated Air Speed (IAS) increased from 240 knots to 332 knots. Approaching FL150, the first officer had a request for a further descent. Just before FL150 the ATC recleared the flight to continue descent to FL50. One second later autopilot disengaged and thereafter the aircraft was manually flown by the captain. Between FL150 and FL140, for approximately 24 seconds, the aircraft experienced 10 oscillations in pitch axis which exceeded the limit manoeuvring load factor. Maximum recorded values were: +4.7 g and -3:26 g. During the event the thrust power was reduced. At about FL130, after aircraft recovery from the encountered oscillations, the first officer declared an emergency, saying: “We are in emergency sir, request vector to final approach. We have problems with the controls”. At the request of the flight crew, radar vectoring was provided by the ATC, and a visual approach and landing was performed on runway 08R. It appeared that the cabin interior had been completely destroyed, resulting in fatal injuries to seven passengers.

CAUSAL FACTORS:
1. Inadequate risk assessments of the PITCH FEEL malfunctions.
2. Overriding of the A/P on the pitch channel by the crew.
3. Inappropriate inputs on the control column at high speed and with Arthur unit failed in ‘low-speed’ mode leading to Pilot Induced Oscillations.
4. Seat-belts not fastened during descent flight phase.
Sources:
» FINAL REPORT on THE ACCIDENT – FALCON 900B / SX-ECH
» Flight International

Official accident investigation report
investigating agency: Romania MoT
report status: Final
report number: Report sx-h990914
report released: 01-AUG-2000
duration of investigation: 322 days (10.7 months)
download report: Final report on the accident of the Falcon 900B registered SX-ECH, 14 September 1999 (Romania MoT Report sx-h990914)

Clonarile de persoana de la Agronomia/Horticultura Craioveana

Se pare ca in zona absolventzilor/doctoranzilor sarbi de la Agronomia/Horticultura din Craiova s-au pus la punct metodele “logistice” de clonare de persoana (armament-carburantzi). Din ce stiu, consilieri SAPARD au fost fostul vecin ing Adrian Rosca, ginerele prof. Ilie (Mecanisme, TCM, Universitatea din Craiova), ca si prof dr ing Emil Badescu, fost shef al fostului prefect Nicolae Giugea (acesta nepot al primarului comunist Draniceanu din Bechet), tatal psihiatrei MAI (Ministerul de Interne), colega de specializare cu vara sen. Mircea Geoana, dr Carmen Monica Saptelei-Ciobanu. Am intzeles ca fostul martor din dilapidarile Olticit SA, av. Furtuna Ctin. a avut foarte multzi clientzi din zona sigurantza natzionala – produse mecanice cetatzeni sarbi (fosti cetatzeni iugoslavi), si prin “inscenarile OLAF” a realizat “box-area” in spatziul ex-iugoslav a multor martori ai genocidului comunisti… Acesti martori devin banci de organe foarte convenabile pentru prelevarile de tip Istanbul… In vara 1993 am fost in aceasta frumoasa atractzie a orashului turistic Craiova cu un infloritor om de afaceri numit Cristian Stanca (reprezentantul Monitorul Oficial in teritoriu), cu doua absolvente de Medicina din Craiova, primitzi fiind de operatorii discotecii, ing. Cristian Florigantza si Octavian Suciu (sotzul – fost – al unei colege de lucrare de diploma), patronii firmei de computere Comrace SA/Starsoft SRL, angajatzi fiind si Adrian Mogaldici, Grigore Carstea…

Parkarile englezesti care “inneaca” cu asphalt

Babel – cine este oare Dorin Cocosh?
March 1, 2013
Dupa divortzul de Furtuna Simona s-a pus la cale substituirea fratzilor Mihai Anatol Bulacu si Miron George Bulacu, probabil inlocuibili de rushii de la Alro SA, impreuna cu ajutorul Procuraturii din Milano. Cred ca acest joc s-a pus la cale prin “orchestrarile” doctorului/profesorului Lucian Orashel, acel proces din 2005 de zice-se, recuperare a PNTCD, cica “interesul natzional”, practic substituirea unor persoane si institutzionalizari medicale pe modelul anilor ’50 Poiana Mare-Poarta Alba-Fagarash. Procedura care l-a pus pe tusha pe Mircea Geoana a fost inceputa prin filmul ?productzia militara? The Guardian, urmata de The Ghostwriter. In realitate, acestea sunt procesele de “spalare” a lui Adrian Nastase-Posta Romana (Alex Bittner si alte “anchete” de presa genul “povestilor” memorialul durerii Lucia Hossu Longin).
Probabil in jocurile de “sterilizare” offshore tip Cipru, eu si maica-mea suntem “teleportatzi” pe votul din septembrie 2011 in Serbia pe modelul bancar-financiar otoman. Nu cred ca totusi economistul Mugur Isarescu doreste sa revina in zona administratziei Otomane, desi, se pare ca Roberta Alma Anastase prin voturile din Parlamentul Romaniei se pare ca a facilitat achizitzionarea uzinelor Kragujevac din Rep. Serbia de catre Fiat, prin niste “facilitatzi de plata” tip Elodia-Dan Diaconescu. De fapt, in Romania, metoda de plata alba-neagra Elodia-Oltchim a fost returnata la originatori, dar in Serbia se pare ca s-a mers mai departe. Probabil in Salonic (Grecia) functzioneaza de facto centralele bancare din zona ale bancilor care actzioneaza in Romania, pe modelul razboiului rece. Nu stiu daca Oltenia-Craiova (Dolj) mai sunt legate de centralele bancare din Austria, ci mai degraba de Salonik. Probabil astfel se poate intzelege administratzia tip Imperiu Otoman (Principatele Romane, posibil Basarabia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Grecia, Liban, Siria, Turcia, Egipt, posibil chiar Iran…). Cred ca asta este adevarata harta geopolitica din care face parte Romania, mai putzin Uniunea Europeana, unde se pare ca a intrat pe niste “artificii” crestin-democrato-liberale-socialiste gestionate de filozoful Andrei Marga, de UDMR-isti, sau de mostenirea Fundatziei Gojdu. Cam astfel se poate intzelege de ce legile statului de drept din Republica Romania sunt la nivelul Tudor Vladimirescu din timpul insurectziei Elefteriei…

De sigurantza, am inceput sa renuntz la abonamentele pe e-mail-ul mabulacu@yahoo.com, din moment ce sunt riscuri de transfer ilegal de know-how… Am auzit ceva despre niste manevre in zona Marii Negre, atunci nu prea mai sunt sigur ca exista in realitate o Romanie membra a Uniunii Europene (exista aceasta Uniune oare?) sau o Romanie membra NATO. Cetatzenia mea canadiana era utila pentru un eventual acces la Agentzia Spatziala Europeana… Cam trist!

Grupul BTT Craiova-Republica Democratica Germana 1983

Curios, am in mana o carte interesanta… Sa fie oare o coincidentza ca m-am inscris la programul de Avionica de la Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, matricola 7024110. Mi s-a recomandat programul din cauza unor stagii de 6 credite, zice-se, platite cu minim 12 CAD/hr…

Problemele medicale au aparut prin AVC-ul mamei mele…

Problemele medicale au aparut – date si ore inconsistente – odata cu accidentul vascular cerebral al mamei mele, petrecut pe 29-30 oct 2001, prin tomografia computerizata Siemens de la Spitalul 1 (judetzean) Craiova, unde varsta mamei mele greshit in loc de 68 (nascuta 6 feb 1933 Dabuleni-Dolj). Curios, inginer de sistem a fost (scolarizat de Siemens, zicea el, Marcel Minae, nepotul tamplarului Nicolae Minaie de la Spitalul Bechet), urmat de alt absolvent de Automatizari si Calculatoare Craiova Doru Danciu. Ambii au fost colegi cu Ioana Ghiocea Mitritzoaia (angajata SIF5 Oltenia-Bakri/SUCPI SA), absolventzi de Automatica in 1989. Cred ca Marcel Minae a fost coleg de Automatica seral cu Adrian Bilgar (Balgar), cel cu “aventura” / rendez-vous aranjat cu Granicerii Orshova din 8 martie 1985… Probabil asha functzioneaza spionajul tehnologic din Romania – prin accidente vasculare provocate (senatorul Ioan Alexandru), canceruri tip Europa Libera (Corneliu Coposu), sau fracturi de col femural tip maica-mea sau Mihai Neshu… Probabil am fost sechestrat de kontraktorii STASI de la SRI Dolj (modelul libian) prin intentzia de confiscare a notelor de curs de la Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, M.Ing., matricola 7024110, incinerate, de sigurantza… Am pastrat doar primele pagini si lista de bibliografie, de sigurantza… Oricum, Vodafone prepaid 0731641000 nu mai functzioneaza de mult, pe modelul notebook-ului HP NC6220, “ars” in 2010 cu virushi MP3… Medicul de familie al mamei mele, dr Madalina Ghigeanu (pare-se absolvent Medicina Bucuresti) cred ca nu mai vrea sa acorde consultatzii decat in stilul injektzie letala tip Michael Jackson, pe motivul pacientzi RRomi sau BOSchetari (AURolaci…) marca Paszkany-Becali-Munk-Soros Valiza cu Bani DNA Cluj-Bucuresti RAFO Onesti SA asistenta Mihaela Coman…

Redactzia “Mesaj Comunist” de la Casa Studentzilor din Craiova

Exista in timpul guvernarii dictatorului Nicolae Ceausescu, cunoscut foarte bine de istoriograful Vladimir Tismaneanu, co-autor al fostului presedinte Ion Iliescu un ziar/pepiniera de talente jurnalistice numit “Mesaj Comunist”, publicat de UASCR Craiova/Casa Studentzilor Craiova (Uniunea Asociatziilor Studentzilor Comunisti), condus centru de dna/tovarasha Tarnitza Daniela (sotzie medic/cadru universitar ortoped) si de fostul lider studentzesc Dragos Cotarcea. Dintre talentele jurnalistice erau actualul psihiatru din California Radu Mischiu sau inginerul automatist Ioan Seicean, cumnatul d-rei Sanziana Parlog-Seicean, el – zice-se – dealer auto in Statele Unite, la Autonation… Curios, Seicean si Mischiu au fost colegi cu dna Mioara Roman si au colaborat se pare cu Viorel Catarama (pare-se Catarama era dintre “taticii” falimentului SAFI Invest SA)…

Congresul PDL – Traian Basescu “Ce ash…”?

Se pare ca eu si maica-mea suntem cenusha partidelor politice, probabil “jumulitzi” si “lapidatzi” pe modelul antic… Cam asta este Romania europeana a lui Ion Iliescu, Emil Constantinescu si Traian Basescu!

United Nations Convention Against Torture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

United Nations Convention against Torture

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Type	Human rights convention
Drafted	10 December 1984[1]
Signed	10 December 1984
Location	New York
Effective	26 June 1987[1]
Condition	20 ratifications[2]
Signatories	78[1]
Parties	151[1]
Depositary	UN Secretary-General[3]
Languages	Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish[4]
Convention against Torture at Wikisource
v t e

Map of the world with parties to the Convention against Torture

  signed and ratified

  signed but not ratified

  not signed and not ratified

The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (United Nations Convention against Torture) is an international human rights instrument, under the review of the United Nations, that aims to prevent torture around the world.

The Convention requires states to take effective measures to prevent torture within their borders, and forbids states to transport people to any country where there is reason to believe they will be tortured.

The text of the Convention was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1984^[1] and, following ratification by the 20th state party,^[2] it came into force on 26 June 1987.^[1] 26 June is now recognised as the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, in honour of the Convention. As of September 2012, the Convention had 151 parties.^[1]

Contents 1 Summary 2 Main provisions 2.1 Definition of torture 2.2 Ban on torture and cruel and degrading treatment 2.3 Ban on refoulement 2.4 Signatories 3 Optional Protocol 3.1 Signatories of the Optional Protocol 4 Committee against Torture 5 See also 6 References 7 External links 7.1 Decisions of the Committee Against Torture

Summary

The Covenant follows the structure of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), with a preamble and 33 articles, divided into three parts:

Part I (Articles 1–16) defines torture (Article 1), and commits parties to taking effective measures to prevent any act of torture in any territory under their jurisdiction (Article 2). These include ensuring that torture is a criminal offense (Article 4), establishing jurisdiction over acts of torture committed by or against a party’s citizens (Article 5), ensuring that torture is an extraditable offense (Article 8), and establishing universal jurisdiction to try cases of torture where an alleged torturer cannot be extradited (Article 5). Parties must promptly investigate any allegation of torture (Articles 12 and 13), and victims of torture must have an enforceable right to compensation (Article 14). Parties must also ban the use of evidence produced by torture in their courts (Article 15), and are barred from deporting, extraditing or refouling people where there are substantial grounds for believing they will be tortured (Article 3).

Parties are also obliged to prevent other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and to investigate any allegation of such treatment within their jurisdiction (Article 16).

Part II (articles 17 – 24) governs reporting and monitoring of the Convention and the steps taken by the parties to implement it. It establishes the Committee against Torture (Article 17), and empowers it to investigate allegations of systematic torture (Article 20). It also establishes an optional dispute-resolution mechanism between parties (Articles 21) and allows parties to recognize the competence of the Committee to hear complaints from individuals about violations of the Convention by a party (Article 22).

Part III (Articles 25 – 33) governs ratification, entry into force, and amendment of the Convention. It also includes an optional arbitration mechanism for disputes between parties (Article 30).

Main provisions

Definition of torture

Article 1 of the Convention defines torture as:

Any act by which severe pain, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person, information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.

— Convention Against Torture, Article 1.1

Actions which fall short of torture may still constitute cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under Article 16.

Ban on torture and cruel and degrading treatment

Article 2 of the convention prohibits torture, and requires parties to take effective measures to prevent it in any territory under its jurisdiction. This prohibition is absolute and non-derogable. “No exceptional circumstances whatsoever”^[5] may be invoked to justify torture, including war, threat of war, internal political instability, public emergency, terrorist acts, violent crime, or any form of armed conflict.^[6] Torture cannot be justified as a means to protect public safety or prevent emergencies.^[6] Neither can it be justified by orders from superior officers or public officials.^[7] The prohibition on torture applies to all territories under a party’s effective jurisdiction, and protects all people under its effective control, regardless of citizenship or how that control is exercised.^[6] Since the convention’s entry into force, this absolute prohibition has become accepted as a principle of customary international law.^[6]

Because it is often difficult to distinguish between cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and torture, the Committee regards Article 16’s prohibition of such treatment as similarly absolute and non-derogable.^[6]

The other articles of part I lay out specific obligations intended to implement this absolute prohibition by preventing, investigating and punishing acts of torture.^[6]

Ban on refoulement

Article 3 prohibits parties from returning, extraditing or refouling any person to a state “where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture”.^[8] The Committee against Torture has held that this danger must be assessed not just for the initial receiving state, but also to states to which the person may be subsequently expelled, returned or extradited.^[9]

Signatories

Participant	Signature	Ratification, accession (a), succession (d)
Afghanistan	4 February 1985	1 April 1987
Albania		11 May 1994 a
Algeria	26 November 1985	12 September 1989
Andorra	5 August 2002	22 September 2006
Antigua and Barbuda		19 July 1993 a
Argentina	4 February 1985	24 September 1986
Armenia		13 September 1993 a
Australia	10 December 1985	8 August 1989
Austria	14 March 1985	29 July 1987
Azerbaijan		16 August 1996 a
Bahamas	16 December 2008
Bahrain		6 March 1998 a
Bangladesh		5 October 1998 a
Belarus	19 December 1985	13 March 1987
Belgium	4 February 1985	25 June 1999
Belize		17 March 1986 a
Benin		12 March 1992 a
Bolivia	4 February 1985	12 April 1999
Bosnia and Herzegovina		1 September 1993 d
Botswana	8 September 2000	8 September 2000
Brazil	23 September 1985	28 September 1989
Bulgaria	10 June 1986	16 December 1986
Burkina Faso		4 January 1999 a
Burundi		18 February 1993 a
Cambodia		15 October 1992 a
Cameroon		19 December 1986 a
Canada	23 August 1985	24 June 1987
Cape Verde		4 June 1992 a
Chad		9 June 1995 a
Chile	23 September 1987	30 September 1988
China	12 December 1986	4 October 1988
Colombia	10 April 1985	8 December 1987
Comoros	22 September 2000
Congo		30 July 2003 a
Costa Rica	4 February 1985	11 November 1993
Côte d’Ivoire		18 December 1995 a
Croatia		12 October 1992 d
Cuba	27 January 1986	17 May 1995
Cyprus	9 October 1985	18 July 1991
Czech Republic		22 February 1993 d
Democratic Republic of the Congo		18 March 1996 a
Denmark	4 February 1985	27 May 1987
Djibouti		5 November 2002 a
Dominican Republic	4 February 1985	24 January 2012
Ecuador	4 February 1985	30 March 1988
Egypt		25 June 1986 a
El Salvador		17 June 1996 a
Equatorial Guinea		8 October 2002 a
Estonia		21 October 1991 a
Ethiopia		14 March 1994 a
Finland	4 February 1985	30 August 1989
France	4 February 1985	18 February 1986
Gabon	21 January 1986	8 September 2000
Gambia	23 October 1985
Georgia		26 October 1994 a
Germany	13 October 1986	1 October 1990
Ghana	7 September 2000	7 September 2000
Greece	4 February 1985	6 October 1988
Guatemala		5 January 1990 a
Guinea	30 May 1986	10 October 1989
Guinea-Bissau	12 September 2000
Guyana	25 January 1988	19 May 1988
Holy See		26 June 2002 a
Honduras		5 December 1996 a
Hungary	28 November 1986	15 April 1987
Iceland	4 February 1985	23 October 1996
India	14 October 1997
Indonesia	23 October 1985	28 October 1998
Iraq		7 July 2011 a
Ireland	28 September 1992	11 April 2002
Israel	22 October 1986	3 October 1991
Italy	4 February 1985	12 January 1989
Japan		29 June 1999 a
Jordan		13 November 1991 a
Kazakhstan		26 August 1998 a
Kenya		21 February 1997 a
Kuwait		8 March 1996 a
Kyrgyzstan		5 September 1997 a
Lao People’s Democratic Republic	21 September 2010
Latvia		14 April 1992 a
Lebanon		5 October 2000 a
Lesotho		12 November 2001 a
Liberia		22 September 2004 a
Libya		16 May 1989 a, then Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein	27 June 1985	2 November 1990
Lithuania		1 February 1996 a
Luxembourg	22 February 1985	29 September 1987
Madagascar	1 October 2001	13 December 2005
Malawi		11 June 1996 a
Maldives		20 April 2004 a
Mali		26 February 1999 a
Malta		13 September 1990 a
Mauritania		17 November 2004 a
Mauritius		9 December 1992 a
Mexico	18 March 1985	23 January 1986
Monaco		6 December 1991 a
Mongolia		24 January 2002 a
Montenegro		23 October 2006 d
Morocco	8 January 1986	21 June 1993
Mozambique		14 September 1999 a
Namibia		28 November 1994 a
Nauru	12 November 2001
Nepal		14 May 1991 a
Netherlands	4 February 1985	21 December 1988
New Zealand	14 January 1986	10 December 1989
Nicaragua	15 April 1985	5 July 2005
Niger		5 October 1998 a
Nigeria	28 July 1988	28 June 2001
Norway	4 February 1985	9 July 1986
Pakistan	17 April 2008	3 June 2010
Palau	20 September 2011
Panama	22 February 1985	24 August 1987
Paraguay	23 October 1989	12 March 1990
Peru	29 May 1985	7 July 1988
Philippines		18 June 1986 a
Poland	13 January 1986	26 July 1989
Portugal	4 February 1985	9 February 1989
Qatar		11 January 2000 a
Republic of Korea [South]		9 January 1995 a
Republic of Moldova		28 November 1995 a
Romania		18 December 1990 a
Russian Federation	10 December 1985	3 March 1987
Rwanda		15 December 2008 a
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines		1 August 2001 a
San Marino	18 September 2002	27 November 2006
São Tomé and Príncipe	6 September 2000
Saudi Arabia		23 September 1997 a
Senegal	4 February 1985	21 August 1986
Serbia		12 March 2001 d
Seychelles		5 May 1992 a
Sierra Leone	18 March 1985	25 April 2001
Slovakia		28 May 1993 d
Slovenia		16 July 1993 a
Somalia		24 January 1990 a
South Africa	29 January 1993	10 December 1998
Spain	4 February 1985	21 October 1987
Sri Lanka		3 January 1994 a
Sudan	4 June 1986
Swaziland		26 March 2004 a
Sweden	4 February 1985	8 January 1986
Switzerland	4 February 1985	2 December 1986
Syrian Arab Republic		19 August 2004 a
Tajikistan		11 January 1995 a
Thailand		2 October 2007 a
The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia		12 December 1994 d
Timor-Leste		16 April 2003 a
Togo	25 March 1987	18 November 1987
Tunisia	26 August 1987	23 September 1988
Turkey	25 January 1988	2 August 1988
Turkmenistan		25 June 1999 a
Uganda		3 November 1986 a
Ukraine	27 February 1986	24 February 1987
United Arab Emirates		19 July 2012 a
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland	15 March 1985	8 December 1988
United States of America	18 April 1988	21 October 1994
Uruguay	4 February 1985	24 October 1986
Uzbekistan		28 September 1995 a
Vanuatu		12 July 2011 a
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)	15 February 1985	29 July 1991
Yemen		5 November 1991 a
Zambia		7 October 1998 a

Optional Protocol

The Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT), adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December 2002 and in force since 22 June 2006, provides for the establishment of “a system of regular visits undertaken by independent international and national bodies to places where people are deprived of their liberty, in order to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,”^[10] to be overseen by a Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

Signatories of the Optional Protocol

As of September 2012 the Protocol has 72¿ signatories and 63 parties.^[11]

Committee against Torture

The Committee against Torture (CAT) is a body of human rights experts that monitors implementation of the Convention by State parties. The Committee is one of eight UN-linked human rights treaty bodies. All state parties are obliged under the Convention to submit regular reports to the CAT on how rights are being implemented. Upon ratifying the Convention, states must submit a report within one year, after which they are obliged to report every four years. The Committee examines each report and addresses its concerns and recommendations to the State party in the form of “concluding observations.” Under certain circumstances, the CAT may consider complaints or communications from individuals claiming that their rights under the Convention have been violated.

The CAT usually meets in April/May and November each year in Geneva. Members are elected to four-year terms by State parties and can be re-elected if nominated.

The current membership of the CAT:^[12]

Name	State	Term Expires
Claudio Grossman (chair)	Chile	2015
Xuexian Wang (vice-chair)	China	2013
Essadia Belmir (vice-chair)	Morocco	2013
Felice D. Gaer (vice-chair)	USA	2015
Nora Sveaass (rapporteur)	Norway	2013
Satyabhoosun Gupt Domah	Mauritius	2015
Alessio Bruni	Italy	2013
George Tugushi	Georgia	2015
Abdoulaye Gaye	Senegal	2015
Fernando Mariño Menéndez	Spain	2013

See also

• Execution of Rizana Nafeek
• International Day in Support of Victims of Torture
• Uses of torture in recent times

References

1. ^ ^{a b c d e f g} United Nations Treaty Collection: Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Retrieved on 13 September 2012.
2. ^ ^{a b} Convention Against Torture, Article 27. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
3. ^ Convention Against Torture, Article 25. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
4. ^ Convention Against Torture, Article 33. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
5. ^ Convention Against Torture, Article 2.2. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
6. ^ ^{a b c d e f} “CAT General Comment No. 2: Implementation of Article 2 by States Parties” (PDF). Committee against Torture. 2007-11-23. pp. 2. Retrieved 2008-06-16.
7. ^ Convention Against Torture, Article 2.3. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
8. ^ Convention Against Torture, Article 3.1. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
9. ^ “CAT General Comment No. 01: Implementation of article 3 of the Convention in the context of article 22”. UN OHCHR. 1997-11-21. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
10. ^ OPCAT, Article 1.
11. ^ “Parties to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment”. United Nations Treaty Collection. Retrieved 2012-09-04.
12. ^ “Committee Against Torture – Membership”. United Nations OHCHR. 2009. Retrieved 2010-01-29.

YR-FEL, respectiv Judecatoria Craiova, Sectia Civila, dosarele 3959/251/2009 si 2948/215/2013

3. Foarte probabil exista cineva care in Montreal a lucrat la Sextant Avionique Canada in 1994-1995 sub conducerea inginerilor Alain Martre si Louis Rene de St.Germain, dupa ce lucrase la Innotech Aviation si ?Beel? Technologies, acum lucrand pentru Honeywell Avionics ?Phoenix? Arizona, fost ?angajat? la Avioane Craiova SA, foarte probabil acest GABRIEL lucrand prin furt de identitate pe numele meu. Nu stiu daca Gabriel Nitescu, cetatzean canadian, sotzul informaticienei Olga si tatal lui George a folosit sau nu actele mele de studii respectiv falsuri dupa pasapoarte sau este in realitate Viktor Bout, probabil agent de vanzari pentru Pilatus Aircraft din Stans-Elvetzia. Probabil “cartea” (joker-ul) Gabriel Nitescu-Arizona este in realitate un SECURITY CERTIFICATE care ii tzine probabil in shah pe Geoana Mircea si poate un pic in “corzi” pe un actual politician de culoare nord-american… Sper ca laureatul Nobel-ului pentru pace Barak Obama nu va inchide inchisoarea Guantanamo dupa limpezirea situatziei Gabriel-Olga-George Nitescu din Phoenix-Arizona…

SES-10 (95-01) Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal

Scan-ul de Fin d’Etudes de la Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal inseamna de fapt linia de credit care a permis cumpararea Petromidia SA de catre ziaristul Ctin. Dinu Patriciu (prin jocurile juridice de cesiune de creantze ale statului roman catre Libia si Angola – Angola – Doru Ioan Taracila-Dan Cherciu – Craiova), respectiv un loc in CA al SIF 5 Oltenia (consiliul de administratzie) si un post de senator pentru ?varul? prin aliantza Mario-Ovidiu Oprea, coleg de TCM Craiova cu fosta asistenta la Rezistentza Materialelor, dna Daniela Tarnitza, sotzul ortopedului de la Spitalul 1 Craiova (vezi fractura de col femural a mamei mele din nov 2002…). Prin martie 1999 se pare ca Politzia Craiova a pus la cale o procedura de recrutare de informatori prin importul de la Aventure Surplus din Lyon-France, procedura de recrutare care permitea se pare un scenariu de institutzionalizare psihiatrica (existau 2 variante:

1. prin psihiatria Dolj-Ciobanu/Chiritza Ciobanu/Saptelei, Boiangiu-SIE, Udristoiu-UMF Dolj-PDL Dolj – permitzand substituirea fratzilor intre ei Mihai cu Miron, facilitata prin divortzul rapid de notarul public Furtuna Simona
2. prin psihiatria germana (vezi litigiile de restituire de proprietatzi imobiliare si proprietate  industriala si intelectuala) facilitate se pare de conservatorii si liberalii canadieni prin fosta sotzie a patinatorului norvegian, dna deputat Belinda Caroline Stronach (de fapt jocurile corporate Magna Corp. intre Oleg Deripaska si grupul Mark Rich-Glencore)

Scenariul de institutzionalizare psihiatrica a fost facilitat de americani prin filmul “Meet the Parents” (2000) cu Robert de Niro. In acest moment se pare ca are loc o tentativa de recuperare de linie de credit intre ?oligarho-ziaristul Ctin. Dinu Patriciu, Frank si Belinda Stronach si Oleg Deripaska, facilitat de litigiile ONU dintre Guvernul Francez si comunitatea rroma din Frantza si Romania. Probabil englezii si francezii faciliteaza substituirea de persoana si institutzionalizarea psihiatrica a supravietzuitorilor dintre fam. Bulacu, pe modelul scenariilor din Ghost Planes, de Stephen Grey…. Rog pe Belinda Stronach sa ma intzeleaga ca sunt disponibil ca si fotograf corporat la Magna, la fundatzia ei, sau ca si web publisher… Sunt disponibil si ca si consultant de securitate informatica sau de certificare aeronautica (airworthiness), conform job description de la Innotech Aviation din Montreal, 1996…

mabulacu@yahoo.com este “inghetzat” la DRAFT

Aparent jocul de rapire este facut prin zona fostilor colegi de facultate, ing. Stefania Rusoiu (sora unei angajate Unicredit Bank Craiova), sotzia unui var al senatorului Mircea Geoana. Aparent prin ei este facuta sechestrarea de persoana, custodie psihiatrica si spionaj aeronautic/tehnologic. Probabil daca Stefania Rusoiu mai este inca angajata dupa repartitzia din vara 1990 la FEA SA (in grupul Nuclearelectrica), atunci aceasta rapire apare ca spionaj nuclear in Canada, cu rapire de familii de romani, in Romania… Sau KAMATARIE? Se pare ca in realitate, canadienii lui Steven Harper au decis sa participe impreuna cu americanii la reforma asigurarilor de sanatate oferind cobai, familia unor victime… Halal, Canada! Probabil prin INTRANET-ul FEA SA/Romenergo SA se face routarea <mabulacu@aol.com>:
64.12.90.98 (bouncing e-mail…). Probabil daca e-mail-urile nu “bounce”, atunci cecurile lor “bounce”….

Aparent, yahoo.com blocheaza de la postarea

Babel – cine este oare Dorin Cocosh?

March 1, 2013 Dupa divortzul de Furtuna Simona s-a pus la cale substituirea fratzilor Mihai Anatol Bulacu si Miron George Bulacu, probabil inlocuibili de rushii de la Alro SA, impreuna cu ajutorul Procuraturii din Milano. Cred ca acest joc s-a pus la cale prin “orchestrarile” doctorului/profesorului Lucian Orashel, acel proces din 2005 de zice-se, recuperare a PNTCD, cica “interesul natzional”, practic substituirea unor persoane si institutzionalizari medicale pe modelul anilor ’50 Poiana Mare-Poarta Alba-Fagarash. Procedura care l-a pus pe tusha pe Mircea Geoana a fost inceputa prin filmul ?productzia militara? The Guardian, urmata de The Ghostwriter. In realitate, acestea sunt procesele de “spalare” a lui Adrian Nastase-Posta Romana (Alex Bittner si alte “anchete” de presa genul “povestilor” memorialul durerii Lucia Hossu Longin)

Website: mabulacu@yahoo.com este “inghetzat” la DRAFT | Mihai Bulacu’s Blog (IP: 72.232.113.14 , wordpress.com)
URL: https://mihaibulacu.wordpress.com/2013/03/18/mabulacuyahoo-com-este-inghetzat-la-draft/